Alan Thicke was a Canadian actor, comedian, and television host who was best known for his role as Jason Seaver on the popular family sitcom “Growing Pains.” He was also a prolific television producer and songwriter, and wrote the theme songs for several popular TV shows, including “Diff’rent Strokes,” “The Facts of Life,” and “Wheel of Fortune.”

Thicke began his career in the entertainment industry in the 1970s, working as a television host and producer in Canada before moving to Los Angeles to pursue a career in Hollywood. He quickly found success as an actor, and appeared in numerous television shows and movies throughout his career.

Thicke was also a noted philanthropist and community activist, and was involved with numerous charities and organizations throughout his life. He was a passionate advocate for education and the arts, and was committed to helping young people achieve their full potential.

Tragically, Thicke passed away in 2016 at the age of 69 after suffering a heart attack. His death was widely mourned by fans and colleagues in the entertainment industry, who remembered him as a talented and beloved figure who had made a lasting impact on popular culture.

Much like the battle over the estate of late actor Robin Williams, a contentious battle over the estate of Alan Thicke is heating up in the courts. The battle is over a prenup that his wife signed, and his wife, Callau, is claiming that the prenup she signed (in around 2005) was invalid. She is claiming that there are difficulties with the prenup and the trust left behind by Thicke. Thicke left Callau the ranch’s furnishings, 25% of his personal assets, a $500,000 life insurance policy, and all of his death benefits from pensions and union memberships. Callau was also receiving (at the time this article was written) 40% of his remaining estate. You can read more here

 

The new October 2016 Federal Government Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) rules are causing many Canadians to review and revise existing Wills and Estate Planning strategies according to STEP (The Society of Trust and Estate Planners).

To track the capital gains that foreign buyers have been avoiding on the purchase and sale of Canadian residential real estate, the new federal rules have created complications for many Canadians who use Trusts and Qualified Disability Trusts (QDTs) as part of their Legacy planning strategies. (The following points are just some highlights and specific tax and legal advice will be needed for each individual situation.)

Under the new rules, notes Ian Lebane, a tax and estate specialist with TD Wealth Private Client Services, only three types of trusts are eligible to claim the PRE:

  1. Life interest trusts, which generally are trusts that would benefit from a rollover.
  2. Qualified disability trusts.
  3. A trust created for a minor child of the settlor (the person contributing assets or money to the trust, generally a parent).


In addition, the trust will only be eligible if the beneficiary is:

  • A resident in Canada during the year.
  • If the trust acquires property after October 2, 2016, “the terms of the trust must provide the beneficiary with a right to the use and enjoyment of the housing unit as a residence throughout the period in the year in which the trust owns the property.”

Regarding the trust terms, most existing trusts are not currently drafted that way, says Lebane, but for “any wills where the testator is still alive, they need to have that language.” Furthermore, each type of trust has its own beneficiary requirements.

Using one common planning example, where significant problem arise, involves life interest spousal trusts, commonly used in second marriage scenarios. It is only possible to claim the PRE “if the right to occupy is unconditional for the spouse’s lifetime.” Yet many such trusts place conditions on the spouse’s living in the home, such as the right to residency until they remarry or specifying that the spouse must pay for utilities and upkeep.

Even if the right is unconditional, the trust will be offside if it directs sale proceeds of the property to any other beneficiaries while the spouse is still alive.

People can only benefit from one QDT at a time, which can restrict planning. According to Lebane, It is common for one QDT to hold the principal residence and another one to hold the investments, which may force you to choose between using one or the other QDT for maximum tax planning benefits.

Lebane also recommends to use the preferred beneficiary election (PBE) for the investment trust which would allow the trust’s income to be taxed in the disability beneficiary’s hands, while leaving the home to qualify for the PRE.

Yet, in all cases, the beneficiary of a QDT must qualify for the Disability Tax Credit (DTC). If the intended beneficiary has not yet qualified for the DTC, yet, then you should initiate the process to qualify immediately, says Lebane.

Finally, in the case of minor child trusts, the new PRE rules are problematic. Current trusts often provide for the use of the residence if they are under age 18, but under the new rules, once a child turns 18 and leaves home to attend post-secondary schooling, the trust now becomes ineligible for the PRE, says Lebane. A valuable asset such as the family home can be a big responsibility for an adult child to own outright and may thwart the planning intentions of the deceased parents.

Another wrinkle, says Lebane, is the minor child trust is ineligible for the PRE if one parent is still alive, “regardless of the relationship with the child. The options for trusts for minor children are now quite narrow”, he says.

It is important for all Canadians to review their current Wills and Estate plans to ensure that the proper wording is incorporated within those documents to avoid taxes being charged on, what used to be totally tax exempt, principal residence.

Article provided by Iftikhar Mahmood. CFP.

He can be reached at [email protected].

Certified Financial Planner, createwealth planning; Focused on the growth – and preservation – of your wealth

Please note: this article is not a substitute for legal advice. This article only provides general information which you may find helpful. You may wish to consult with a qualified professional financial or legal advisor, as appropriate.

Prince Rogers Nelson

The musical icon known as Prince passed away on April 21st 2016 at the age of 57. Prince Rogers Nelson died intestate (without a Will) at his home at Paisley Park in Minnesota. The estimated $150 million dollar fortune left behind by the mogul is now currently up in the air, as Minnesota inheritance laws will determine who the fortunate recipient will be.

Initially valued at $300 million, Prince’s fortunes have dwindled away over the years, possibly due as some would suggest, to a lack of high-powered attorneys and a constant rotation of financial advisers to look after his affairs.

Continue reading

Celebrity wills

Funnyman Robin William’s death by suicide was a huge shock to many who grew up watching Williams in several movies, shows, etc., over the years. 

Robin Williams’ estate battle was a legal dispute that arose after his death in 2014. Williams, a beloved actor and comedian, left behind a sizable estate worth an estimated $100 million, including real estate, investments, and intellectual property rights.

The main issue in the estate battle was how Williams’ assets would be distributed among his heirs. Williams had been married three times and had three adult children from his first two marriages. His third wife, Susan Schneider Williams, was not the mother of any of his children.

Schneider Williams claimed that she was entitled to a significant portion of Williams’ estate, including his Tiburon, California home, which she had shared with him during their marriage. However, Williams’ children argued that they were entitled to the majority of their father’s assets, as outlined in his estate plan.

The dispute was resolved through a private settlement in 2015, which was not publicly disclosed. However, court documents revealed that the settlement allowed Schneider Williams to keep certain assets, including property in California and some of Williams’ personal effects, while the majority of his estate was left to his children.

According to this article, The battle between his wife and three children, Zachary, Zelda and Cody finally came to a resolution in the courts: 

A) William’s wife, Susan Schneider Williams, retains ownership of their home in Tiburon, California
B) William’s children have acquired ownership of William’s memorabilia and awards, along with other (unnamed) items

You can read more HERE.

The Robin Williams estate battle serves as a reminder of the importance of proper estate planning and the potential complications that can arise in the absence of a clear and comprehensive estate plan.